Where fairness, growth and cohesion go hand in hand. Minister for Energy and Digital Development Anders Ygeman:"Sweden is a successful country within digitalisation, but to retain our position we need more digital specialists. An important part of achieving this is working to ensure that more women choose to study on IT education programmes.
We need to highlight the women role models working in this area today, and we need more of them. The Government has presented a bill to the Riksdag containing a proposal concerning new sexual offence legislation that is based on consent. Sex must be voluntary — if it is not, then it is illegal. The Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority has been tasked with informing young people about the new legislation. The Riksdag voted in favour of the Government's proposal. The amendments will come into force on 1 July Sweden has the world's first feminist government.
In practice, this means a commitment to building a society in which women and men, girls and boys can live their lives to their full potential.
- Our Method: A Conjoint Experiment Embedded in a Survey.
- Regions are an integral part of Europe…;
- After Adlestrop.
- Politics and government.
- Redeeming the Lost (Tales of Kolmar)!
Gender equality is a matter of human rights, of democracy and of justice. It is also an engine driving social development and creating genuine change in society and in people's lives.
Site Search Navigation
Sweden has a feminist government that is working to achieve gender equality at all levels of society. Gender equality in the budget process is of central importance in realising feminist policies. As far as possible, the budget is to promote gender equality so that all people, regardless of gender, can live a gender-equal life.
Women and men must have the same power to shape society and their own lives; this is a human right and a matter of democracy and justice. There is also overwhelming evidence that gender equality boosts economic growth. Despite this, trade policy today benefits men more than women.
Explore global opinions on political systems by country
The initiative has gained a foothold in more than 60 countries and has so far resulted in 32 new or edited articles about women on Wikipedia. These articles have now been viewed more than million times. On 15 August at Fashion Week Trade, Minister for Foreign Trade Ann Linde will be taking part in a round-table discussion on feminist trade policy and its relevance for the fashion industry.
Published on 8 March Today - on the International Women's Day - the Government of France and the Government of Sweden are proud to announce our joint decision to develop a common strategy for combating human trafficking for sexual exploitation in Europe and globally. Yes, I accept cookies. A Feminist Government.
How countries around the world view democracy, military rule and other political systems
Related links Related navigation Gender-responsive budgeting Gender equality Feminist foreign policy Fact sheet: Action plan to combat prostitution and trafficking in human beings Gender equality in health The Swedish Gender Equality Agency Fact sheet: A Feminist Government Information material: Gender equality policy in Sweden Swedish website regeringen. We see the inequality between women and men as a social problem. The Governments sub-targets for gender equality 16 August Sub-target 1: Equal division of power and influence Illustration: Annika Carlsson.
Sub-target 2: Financial gender equality Illustration: Annika Carlsson. Sub-target 3: Gender-equitable education Illustration: Annika Carlsson. Sub-target 4: An even division of unpaid housework and care work Illustration: Annika Carlsson. Sub-target 5: Gender-equal health Illustration: Annika Carlsson. Arbetsmarknadsminister Eva Nordmark. Minster for Infrastructure Tomas Eneroth. According to Jacobs and Shapiro, most public opinion research is used to manipulate the public rather than to act on its wishes.
As discussed by V. Key , latent public opinion is, in effect, a probable future reaction by the public to a current decision or action by a public official or a government. Politicians who ignore the possible consequences of latent public opinion risk setback or defeat in future elections. Government leaders who take latent public opinion into account, on the other hand, may be willing to undertake an unpopular action that has a negative effect on public opinion in the near term, provided that the action is also likely to have a significant positive effect at a later and more important time.
Public opinion seems to be much more effective in influencing policy making at the local level than at the state or national levels. One reason for this is that issues of concern to local governments—such as the condition of roads, schools, and hospitals—are less complex than those dealt with by governments at higher levels; another is that at the local level there are fewer institutional or bureaucratic barriers between policy makers and voters. Representative government itself, however, tends to limit the power of public opinion to influence specific government decisions, since ordinarily the only choice the public is given is that of approving or disapproving the election of a given official.
Public opinion polling can provide a fairly exact analysis of the distribution of opinions on almost any issue within a given population. Assuming that the proper questions are asked, polling can reveal something about the intensity with which opinions are held, the reasons for these opinions, and the probability that the issues have been discussed with others. Polling can occasionally reveal whether the people holding an opinion can be thought of as constituting a cohesive group.
However, survey findings do not provide much information about the opinion leaders who may have played an important part in developing the opinion although this information may be obtained through subgroup analysis, provided that the original sample is large enough to ensure that reports of opinion leaders are statistically reliable to a reasonable degree. However, polls cannot identify the likely future actions of the public in general, nor can they predict the future behaviour of individuals. They are also inappropriate as tools for exploring concepts unfamiliar to respondents.
One of the best predictors of how people will vote is, simply, the vote that they cast in the last election. This is especially true if they automatically vote for the same political party , say they strongly support that party, and state that they are certain that they will vote. Polls may serve a variety of purposes. Those reported in the media, for example, may be used to inform, to entertain, or to educate.
Right to freedom of opinion and expression
European governance could happen differently at all levels: municipalities, regions, States, State clusters, and federal government would take on different competencies , rather than competing over prerogatives and accountability. However, it is doubtful that this strong relationship represents a fundamental crisis of member States as actors in the EU, and the same would probably hold true for a united, federal Europe. Instead, what we are seeing is precisely the emergence of true multi-level governance, in which regions take on more responsibilities for local governance, States remain key political and institutional actors, and State clusters acquire greater visibility in representing their common interests.
The public is by now familiar with terms like V4, Nordics, Eurocore and Club Med, all varyingly informal entities that represent geographical and cultural clusters of member States at a EU level. Conversely, in a European Federation, the federal level would represent the overall coordinator of this multi-level system, with specifically defined competencies and rights. What we are not seeing, however, is the demise of the nation State as a political actor. This is a common trope amongst federalists, who have a rather black and white view of nationalism and either think that the nation State is a thing of the past or that we should actively get rid of it.
In this context, they see the European Federation not as a polity in which regions, States and clusters complement each other, but one in which the nation-State is dismantled. The first thing to note, however, is that there is no empirical support for the idea that nation-States are dead. The United States, while internally federated, are for all intents and purposes a nation-State, with a common, homogeneous baseline.
Russia, while internally diverse on a scope that is often underestimated, also places great stock on national elements. Japan is a nation State. China might well be a peculiar case but it is hardly an example of a federal, post-national polity. In fact, as noted by Norberto Bobbio, Nicola Matteucci and Gianfranco Pasquino in their Dictionary of Politics , nation-States are effectively the sole baseline framework that is capable of producing workable polities today — even when those later on evolve into multinational States and possibly federations.
This is the single underpinning strategic imperative behind European unity. With this said, one could argue that we should actively work to bring about the demise of the nation-State.
Getting Involved in Democracy | Our Country, Our Parliament
This position stems from the reductive association of the European nation-State with the World Wars — and ignores the foundations upon which States in the modern sense — and supranational organizations like the EU itself — are founded. More dangerously, it severely underestimates the importance played by member States in the lives and perceptions of Europeans, thereby widening the gap between European federalism and the electorate.
Member States are still the most relevant political environment for the majority of Europeans, and winning them over requires respecting this reality. There is a further problem in that most proposed splits make no sense at all.